Buy Fish Mox Online
As Ed Cara reports for Gizmodo, the disconcerting research was presented recently at a clinical meeting of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), meaning the results have not yeat been peer-reviewed. A team based out of the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy investigated the online fish antibiotic market and looked at customer reviews and comments on websites that sell fish antibiotics in the United States.
buy fish mox online
Of course, desperation is likely a factor that drives people to buy fish antibiotics online instead of following the standard channels of medical diagnosis. More than 27 million people in the United States did not have health insurance coverage in 2018, and costs of pharmaceuticals are rising.
They focused on nine fish antibiotics that could be misused by humans: amoxicillin, cephalexin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, erythromycin, metronidazole, penicillin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The team noted the cost and availability of the drugs, and compared the number of likes and dislikes for 2,288 reviews related to human and non-human use. In an attempt to avoid falsely inflating the number, the researchers didn't include generic quotes like "good product" in their data.
The authors concluded: "Although infrequent, antibiotics intended for fish use are being purchased online without a prescription for self-medication to circumvent professional medical care. Reviews related to human use generate significant online traffic compared to reviews unrelated to human use."
Asked why people might buy drugs marketed for fish, Bookstaver said: "The convenience of online purchasing and in-home delivery is likely a contributor. The patient does not have to leave the home to receive treatment. Avoiding a visit to a physician's office and the pharmacy may not only be perceived as inconvenient but also a financial burden to the patient.
But Bookstaver noted the comments were anonymous and to online vendors, and therefore do not necessarily mean the users actually intended to or took the drugs. Some people may buy and not leave a comment or review for their purchase, he said.
Bookstaver was emphatic that people should not buy antibiotics online. "Self-treating typically means self-diagnosis, which has significant potential for harm," he said. "If you feel you are sick, it is important to seek care for proper diagnosis. Many of these infections may not require antibiotics if they are due to a virus or other non-bacterial cause."
He went on: "The use of fish antibiotics, or any antibiotics obtained without proper prescription, may cause unintended adverse effects, delay appropriate treatment and thus put others at risk for spread of the infection, and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance."
Their interest in this topic was also piqued by two studies. One was a case study published in the New England Journal Of Medicine, on a member of the Army Special Forces who had bought fish medication at his local pet store. The other was a study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine earlier this year, which identified the trend of people using antibiotics they weren't prescribed as a "seemingly prevalent and understudied public health problem in the United States."
Last month, this issue was the focus of an article published by WBUR public radio, which featured a 63-year-old man whose fridge was stocked with antibiotics for fish. He said he took matters into his own hands after his doctor was reluctant to give him the drugs.
First, fish antibiotics are completely unregulated. Technically, they should fall under the purview of the Food and Drug Administration, which oversees both human and animal drugs. Those animals including companion animals (dogs, cats, horses) and food animals (cattle, pigs, chickens). Yet no ornamental fish antibiotics are approved by the FDA.
"The antibiotics available in pet stores or online for ornamental fish have not been approved, conditionally approved, or indexed by the FDA, so it is illegal to market them," the FDA said in a statement to Smithsonian.com. The statement continued:
The FDA says that it does not have any data on how prevalent the fish antibiotics problem is. "We are currently looking into these products," representatives wrote in a statement. "FDA considers taking action based on its resources, the risk the product poses, and its public health priorities."
In 2002, Army physician Brandon J. Goff wrote a letter to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine documenting an encounter with an unnamed Army Special Forces soldier who came to him with a sinus infection after self-medicating with fish antibiotics from a pet store. The soldier described this source of antibiotics as "common knowledge among all branches of the American Special Forces community," according to Goff.
I have a great aquarium but I find that if I don't use 1 250mg tablet of fishmox weekly the bacteria starts to grow, I can see the slime begin to develop on their scales. With out it I would lose the aquarium
This really was purchased for one of my pet Bettas, regularly susceptible to infections of some sort. Thank goodness these antibiotics are readily available online for an effective treatment and cure.
The water in my area isn't good even with betta bowl plus and noticed changes in my fish. The other tank with other fish also had some changes that didn't seem good either. They were losing activity and color. Someone from pet smart mentioned they might need antibiotics and recommended this one. After a few days, they were almost back to their vibrant, active selves. I'm thankful for fish mox and the employee at pet smart for recommending this.
Fish Mox (Amoxicillin) exerts a bactericidial action on gram positive and some gram negative bacteria. Useful for control of some common bacterial fish diseases including aeromonas and pseudomonas. *Caution : Not for Human Use.
This study is a systematic review of cultural narratives that drive American belief in the value and efficacy of stocking up on fish antibiotics for human consumption. Popularized by "doomsday prepper" forums and survivalist medical professionals' online videos, this narrative suggests that in some scenarios humans may benefit from such treatments-even as they note its contraindication to mainstream public health advice. Discussions in crowd-sourcing forums however, reveal that in practice Americans are using them as a form of home remedy to treat routine infections without missing work or to make up for gaps in insurance coverage. This article argues for greater attention to what makes it plausible and reasonable to treat human conditions with animal medications. It suggests that public health initiatives should address such decisions as emerging from a rational analysis of social and economic conditions rather than dismissing such practices as dangerous to population and individual health outcomes. As social scientists of medicine have long argued, collective narratives about health and medicine illustrate deeply the broader contexts in which communities understand and experience bodily state and shape how communities interact with public health institutions and respond to medical expertise. This study surveys online discussions about "fish mox" to show how participants contest medical expertise and promote a more distributed form of populist expertise. As such, consuming fish mox is both panacea for health inequality and a critique of health institutions for perpetrating such stratification.
However, taking these products is not without risk. Unlike antibiotics for humans or other animals, fish antibiotics are completely unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, so it is impossible to know if they contain what the label states and are safe for human consumption. Self-medication with fish antibiotics might contribute to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Patients may also delay appropriate treatment causing potentially life-threatening infections. Like all medications, antibiotics should be dispensed from a pharmacy with a prescription from a licensed medical professional.
For example, there are strict regulations about how human antibiotics must be packaged, stored, and shipped. In an extreme case, the fish antibiotics you buy could be contaminated with protozoan or microbes. However, a more likely scenario is that poor storage conditions could have caused the antibiotics to deteriorate and lose effectiveness.
They are actually intended for fish, you use it for various fin skin or other fish illnesses. They usually come in some sort of capsules that you open and sprinkle the content into the tank as directed. Just an FYI.
A team of researchers at the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy examined online reviews from 24 websites selling nine different kinds of fish antibiotics. These fish antibiotics could be misused by humans, namely amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cephalexin, erythromycin, doxycycline, metronidazole, clindamycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and penicillin.
The team found that out of the reviews, they looked at, 2.4 percent or 55 reviews showed that customers bought the product for human use. These reviews also received more likes from other users than regular reviews did, with 9.2 likes on the comment about human consumption of fish antibiotics compared to just 1.3 likes for those not mentioning human intake.
One of the issues health experts are worried about is that these antibiotics intended for fish are available over-the-counter, while those for dogs and cats still need a prescription. If these drugs are readily available online and in stores, it could contribute to the increasing antimicrobial resistance. Also, it can lead to delayed appropriate treatment, which could endanger the life of the user.
The ASHP reports that consumers that seek cheaper and faster access to antibiotics are consuming drugs that are intended for fish rather than humans. Taking these drugs could potentially lead to dangerous consequences, including adverse side effects, antibiotic drug resistance, and treatment failures. 041b061a72